<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Life is a State of Mind &#187; Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottnolan.org/category/windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottnolan.org</link>
	<description>ideas, thoughts, rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Computer Security and Global Security, Windows Virus?</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2011/01/17/computer-security-and-global-security-windows-virus/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2011/01/17/computer-security-and-global-security-windows-virus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[globalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottnolan.org/?p=2054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are some very interesting developments in the news regarding the Stuxnet virus. I confess that I mostly ignored this virus, like most computer viruses, when it came out as it appeared to impact only computers running the Windows operating system. It turns out I was wrong, it actually uses Windows to spread itself, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some very interesting developments in the news regarding the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet">Stuxnet</a> virus.  I confess that I mostly ignored this virus, like most computer viruses, when it came out as it appeared to impact only computers running the Windows operating system.  It turns out I was wrong, it actually uses Windows to spread itself, but targets industrial equipment, specifically the industrial equipment used in state-run nuclear centrifuges.</p>
<p>It is now looking more and more like this specific computer virus was a kind of software warfare deliberately designed to sabotage a nuclear program in Iran.  This has big ramifications for computer security and global security and needs to be read and understood by everyone with a computer, not just computer security geeks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/world/middleeast/16stuxnet.html">Israeli Test on Worm Called Crucial in Iran Nuclear Delay (NT Times)</a></p>
<p><b>Update:</b> VanityFair has a new, easier to read story about the Stuxnet virus and cuber-warfare:<br />
<a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2011/04/stuxnet-201104">A Declaration of Cyber-War</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2011/01/17/computer-security-and-global-security-windows-virus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows XP and essential software</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2006/12/26/windows-xp-and-essential-software/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2006/12/26/windows-xp-and-essential-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottnolan.org/2006/12/26/windows-xp-and-essential-software/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gah, I find myself once again dipping a toe into the murky waters that make up the Windows(tm) experience. I consider myself extraordinarily fortunate that I have not had to touch any MicroSoft crap for many years now&#8230; but I inherited an old Compaq desktop and my boss suggested we put XP on it so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gah, I find myself once again dipping a toe into the murky waters that make up the Windows(tm) experience.</p>
<p>I consider myself extraordinarily fortunate that I have not had to touch any MicroSoft crap for many years now&#8230;  but I inherited an old Compaq desktop and my boss suggested we put XP on it so I could do the occasional web-form written by idiots that require MSIE as the only browser.  It makes sense.  I can also test websites I make for MSIE compatibility (since IE can&#8217;t handle CSS properly).</p>
<p>So I find myself setting up the whole uber-paranoid security software suite because Windows is so vulnerable&#8230;  and I discover that my information is dated&#8230; I last dabbled in the Win 98/SE era.  Yikes.</p>
<p><b>Update</b>: I have a much newer page of XP information available <a href="http://blog.scottnolan.org/essential-xp-software/">here</a>.  The rest of this post is for posterity only&#8230;</p>
<p>Here is what I have so far:<br />
<a href="http://mozilla.com">Firefox 2.0.0.1</a> (secure and CSS aware browsing)<br />
<a href="http://lavasoftusa.com">Ad-Aware SE Personal 1.06</a> (generic spy-ware/mal-ware remover)<br />
<a href="http://www.safer-networking.org">Spybot Search &#038; Destroy</a> (alternative spy-ware/mal-ware remover)<br />
<a href="http://mcafee.com">McAfee VirusScan</a> (corporate license, thanks to the company I work for)<br />
<a href="http://cygwin.com">cygwin DLL</a> (because I still type like a UNIX/Linux geek)<br />
<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty">putty</a> (because Windows Telnet/Terminal sucks enormously)<br />
<a href="http://vim.org">gvim70</a> (because vim is better than notepad)<br />
<a href="http://opera.com">Opera 9.1</a> (alternative fast browser for low memory Windows boxes)<br />
<a href="http://videolan.org">VideoLAN 0.8.6</a> (best media player with no spyware in it at all)<br />
<a href="http://synergy2.sourceforge.net/">Synergy 2</a> (lets me treat side by side desktops like a two headed machine, cut &#038; paste and same mouse/keyboard shared over both monitors/machines)</p>
<p>It appears that ZoneAlarm is no longer essential because the built-in XP firewall is pretty good, but is that really true?  I really liked ZoneAlarm&#8217;s program manager, which prevented bad Windows software from getting out to the network&#8230;  not sure yet if XP firewall can do that.</p>
<p>XP has a built-in graphic file viewer, so IrFanView is not needed anymore.<br />
XP has a built-in xntp network time protocol client, so Dimension 4 is not needed anymore.</p>
<p>SecureCRT and NetTerm are competitors with Putty &#8211; looks like they all work equally well.</p>
<p>What other suggestions do people have?</p>
<p>What makes your Windows XP box useful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2006/12/26/windows-xp-and-essential-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computers</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2005/12/19/computers-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2005/12/19/computers-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottnolan.org/2005/12/19/computers-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few months ago I volunteered 2 hours of my time as a computer geek to a charity auction, and lovely L.G. won the auction. So Saturday morning found me helping her with her IBM Thinkpad A20m (P3 @700MHz, 256MB, 40GB, XGA, Win2000 Pro). I found myself impressed with the hardware, that this laptop made [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago I volunteered 2 hours of my time as a computer geek to a charity auction, and lovely L.G. won the auction. So Saturday morning found me helping her with her IBM Thinkpad A20m (P3 @700MHz, 256MB, 40GB, XGA, Win2000 Pro). I found myself impressed with the hardware, that this laptop made in 2000 was still running strong and quite useable after 5 years of use and abuse. That is remarkable for a Wintel box. While I am still using my 9 year old SGI O2, and 7 year old Macs, typically a Wintel clone is useless after 3 years. So this old A20m is remarkable, for it&#8217;s hardware.</p>
<p><img alt="thinkpad picture" src="http://scottnolan.org/thinkpad-a20m.gif" /></p>
<p>Windows 2000 Professional is another story. As usual with Windows(tm), there is no security at all, so L.G.&#8217;s browser (MS Internet Explorer) had been completely hijacked by some weather toolbar that kept over-writing her registry. McAfee, Ad-Aware, and Spybot S&#038;D were all finding this annoying application and deleting it, but it kept re-appearing through IE every time we rebooted. I suspect we&#8217;ll have to back up her data, re-install Windows, then restore only certain files. It is incomprehensible that people are not taking legal action against the companies that make this software that effectively steals their computer.</p>
<p>We had to settle for installing Firefox and Opera, and showing L.G. how to use them instead of MSIE, then installing ZoneAlarm, Ad-Aware, Spybot S&#038;D, and updating her commercial copy of McAfee VirusScan (thanks AOL &#8211; best thing you&#8217;ve ever done for your members); and showing her how to boot safe mode and use McAfee, Ad-Aware, and Spybot from safe-mode. We also installed VideoLan because WMP and RealPlayer are both spyware of a sort too. I&#8217;ll be investigating how to cheaply upgrade to more memory and an external backup drive for her. I am so glad I no longer waste my time with Microsoft&#8217;s miserable excuse for an operating system, how frustrating. Updated (12/20) research is that she can get up to <a href="http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=10307543&amp;SearchEngine=Shopper&amp;SearchTerm=10307543&amp;Type=PE&amp;Category=Comp&amp;Gad=0&amp;dcaid=15889">512MB</a> (two sticks of 256MB PC100 SODIMM 144pin) for about $96 and an <a href="http://www.apricorn.com/product_details.php?ID=277">external backup drive</a> (40GB EZ Backit Pro) for $89.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2005/12/19/computers-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computers</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2005/11/21/computers-3/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2005/11/21/computers-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottnolan.org/2005/11/21/113257390151695926/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know I am engaging in post-mortem equine floggery, but Rob Pegoraro over at the Washington Post agrees with what techies have been telling the computer shopping public for several years now: choose a Mac over a PC as your home computer. The nice thing about Mr Pegoraro&#8217;s article, is that he&#8217;s a much better [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I am engaging in post-mortem equine floggery, but Rob Pegoraro over at the Washington Post agrees with what techies have been telling the computer shopping public for several years now: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/19/AR2005111900246.html">choose a Mac over a PC</a> as your home computer.  The nice thing about Mr Pegoraro&#8217;s article, is that he&#8217;s a much better writer than most of us techies, and he sums it all up very succinctly when he says it is no longer a case of &#8220;why should I buy a Mac over a Windows PC?&#8221; but that it is now a case of &#8220;why should I buy Windows at all since it is so insecure, so unstable, and after years of patches it remains insecure?&#8221; &#8211; Bravo.</p>
<p>Mr. Pegararo also gets points for mentioning the Sony decision to include what is essentially a trojan horse rootkit on some of their new audio/music CDs, a format previously thought safe from viruses and malware &#8211; and true ISO 9660 Audio CDs are, but Sony/BMG/Epic/Columbia music CDs are no longer standards compliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2005/11/21/computers-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer Rights</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2005/11/15/113208556457581522/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2005/11/15/113208556457581522/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottnolan.org/2005/11/15/113208556457581522/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More fallout from the Sony/Columbia/Epic/BMG XCP rootkit exlpoit is detailed on Wired (first time I&#8217;ve read Wired in a while). Yikes, the after-effects of such a stupid corporate blunder, compounded by so many people running their MS Windows systems effectively wide open (no security to speak of), are turning out to be huge. Hopefully there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More fallout from the Sony/Columbia/Epic/BMG XCP rootkit exlpoit is detailed on <a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,69573,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2">Wired</a> (first time I&#8217;ve read Wired in a while). Yikes, the after-effects of such a stupid corporate blunder, compounded by so many people running their MS Windows systems effectively wide open (no security to speak of), are turning out to be huge. Hopefully there is a very real cost from all this that is billed to First4Internet, Sony, and Microsoft. BoingBoing has a nice map of the spread of the infection <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2005/11/15/sony_infects_more_th.html">here</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://craphound.com/images/sonyinfectionsdoxpara.jpg" /></p>
<p>If you want to find out the impact to yourself, the EFF has a great <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/004144.php">quick page</a> describing which CDs are infected. Basically only CDs made after March of 2005 have any chance, and apparently only a few of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scottnolan.org/2005/11/15/113208556457581522/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 8/16 queries in 0.100 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: blog.scottnolan.org @ 2012-02-07 12:22:25 -->
